
HR & People Analytics Insights
Upscend Team
-January 6, 2026
9 min read
This article recommends starting learning data collection by integrating HRIS and LMS logs to build an anonymized learner table, then joining performance, product, customer, and finance metrics. It provides a minimal schema, behavioral signals to capture, BI integration tips, data governance fixes, and a 90-day sprint template to produce a board-ready ROI story.
Learning data collection should start with a pragmatic, prioritized plan that ties learning activity to business outcomes. In our experience, teams that begin by mapping the smallest viable signals reach board-level ROI stories far faster than teams that try to capture everything at once. This article lays out a practical roadmap for learning data collection, including prioritized sources, a sample schema, privacy checks, BI integration tips, and a 90-day sprint template.
Begin with the systems that already contain authoritative identity and role data. A prioritized order reduces complexity and delivers quick wins.
We recommend this order for learning data collection to prove learning-culture ROI:
Start by integrating the first two sources (HRIS and LMS logs) to create an anonymous master learner table. That table is the foundation for downstream joins to performance and business metrics.
Prioritize sources that: (1) contain identity linkage, (2) are accessible via API or exports, and (3) map to a business outcome you can measure within 90 days. In most organizations that means HRIS and LMS logs first.
A clear learning measurement plan defines outcomes, hypotheses, inputs, and cadence. We've found that teams who write three measurable hypotheses reduce scope creep and get stakeholder buy-in faster.
Key steps to build your learning measurement plan:
Make the plan visible and measurable. Use a one-page dashboard mock-up to align stakeholders on which metrics matter and why.
Behavioral data for learning focuses on actions that predict outcomes: quiz attempts, content revisits, peer feedback, and in-platform social interactions. Capture timestamps and sequence to enable cohort and funnel analysis.
A lightweight common schema accelerates analysis. Below is a compact schema to support most initial hypotheses for learning data collection.
| Table | Key fields (minimal) |
|---|---|
| learners | employee_id, hire_date, role, manager_id, department, location |
| lms_events | event_id, employee_id, course_id, event_type, timestamp, duration_seconds, score |
| performance | employee_id, review_date, rating, competency_scores, promotion_flag |
| product_metrics | employee_id/user_id, feature_id, usage_count, success_rate, date |
| customer_kpis | account_id, NPS, churn_flag, revenue, date |
Use employee_id as the canonical join key. Hash or pseudonymize IDs for analyses shared beyond HR to protect privacy.
Convert event sequences into funnels: enrollment → start → complete → apply-to-job/task. Track conversion rates and time between steps. Funnels expose the behavioral levers most likely to influence outcomes.
Knowing where to source data for learning ROI is critical. Start with the sources above, then prioritize connectors based on reliability and freshness. In our experience, systems with robust APIs and event-level exports reduce transformation work.
Integration tips for BI platforms:
Practical examples help teams adopt patterns quickly. One approach is to stream LMS events to a staging schema, join to HRIS nightly, then compute cohort-level KPIs in the BI layer. For real-time behavioral flags, incorporate event streams into operational dashboards (available in platforms like Upscend) to trigger micro-interventions.
When choosing tools, prefer BI platforms that support both exploration and scheduled, board-ready reports. Maintain a single source of truth and version your data model to ensure reproducibility.
Messy data and fractured ownership are the two biggest roadblocks to credible learning data collection. We've found organizations often stumble on inconsistent identifiers and unclear ownership for derived metrics.
Practical fixes:
Stakeholder coordination tips:
Start where you can link behavior to business outcomes quickly: HRIS for identity, LMS logs for actions, and one business KPI (e.g., time-to-productivity). Those initial links create credible narratives for leadership and allow you to expand data sources safely.
Run a focused 90-day sprint to produce an initial ROI story. Below is a week-by-week template that balances engineering work, analytics, and stakeholder validation.
90-day sprint template (high-level):
Deliverables at day 90: a reproducible dataset, a dashboard with leading and lagging indicators, and a short ROI narrative that ties learning to a business KPI.
Avoid trying to measure everything. Focus on one clear outcome and a couple of behavioral leading indicators. Keep privacy and compliance in mind when joining HR and product data.
Effective learning data collection starts with a prioritized plan, a minimal common schema, and a short, focused sprint. In our experience, linking HRIS and LMS logs first delivers the fastest path to credible ROI stories that the board can act on. Address messy data early, assign data owners, and use a reproducible model to scale analysis.
Next step: run the 90-day sprint template above, produce a board-ready KPI and a one-page narrative, and expand to product and financial joins in the next quarter.
Call to action: Start by mapping your HRIS and LMS export fields this week and schedule a 30-minute stakeholder alignment meeting to kick off your first 90-day data sprint.